Inability to consent does not diminish the desirability of stroke thrombolysis

Stroke Reports Thursday, July 17th, 2014

Wiley: 9 JUL 2014

Objective

Some have argued that physicians should not presume to make thrombolysis decisions for incapacitated patients with acute ischemic stroke because the risks and benefits of thrombolysis involve deeply personal values. We evaluated the influence of the inability to consent and of personal health-related values on older adults’ emergency treatment preferences for both ischemic stroke and cardiac arrest.

Methods

A total of 2,154 US adults age ≥50 years read vignettes in which they had either suffered an acute ischemic stroke and could be treated with thrombolysis, or had suffered a sudden cardiac arrest and could be treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Participants were then asked (1) whether they would want the intervention, or (2) whether they would want to be given the intervention even if their informed consent could not be obtained. We elicited health-related values as predictors of these judgments. Read More

Sign Up Now
National Minority Quality Forum Clinical Trial Engagement Network Map Childhood Obesity MapHIV Z-Atlas: Peripheral Arterial Disease Atlas Map Lung Cancer Index Z-Atlas: Chronic Kidney Disease AFIB Index Cardiometabolic Health Aliance Minority Diabetes Coalition U.S. Diabetes Index County Edition U.S. Diabetes Index Research Edition Medicare Index Medicare Index Stroke Edition About The Minority Stroke Working Group Hepatitis C Disease Index Lead Risk Index Map MRSA StrokePAD Minority Index The South Texas Diabetes Initiative Minority Stroke Consortium YouTube NMQF Videos IPAB Action Center National Health Index

© 2012 National Minority Quality Forum, Inc. All Rights Reserved.